Intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) seems to be as effective as continuous androgen deprivation (CAD), and may offer advantages with respect to sexual potency.
This conclusion is based on a review of data from 19 phase 2 and eight phase 3 clinical trials of IAD for prostate cancer treatment reported over a recent 10-year period. Sexual dysfunction, hot flushes, and fatigue are well-known adverse effects of androgen deprivation.
IAD allows for hormonal recovery by alternating androgen blockade with treatment cessation. The literature review, detailed in European Urology (2010;57:49-59), indicated that IAD was comparable to CAD in terms of biochemical progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
Continue Reading
In addition, IAD demonstrated tolerability benefits, particularly in terms of sexual function.
Enjoying our content?
Thanks for visiting Renal & Urology News. We hope you’re enjoying the latest clinical news, full-length features, case studies, and more.
You’ve viewed {{metering-count}} of {{metering-total}} articles this month. If you wish to read unlimited content, please log in or register below. Registration is free.
{{login-button}} {{register-button}}
Log in to continue reading this article.
Don’t miss out on today’s top content on Renal & Urology News. Register for free and gain unlimited access to:
- Clinical News, with personalized daily picks for you
- Case Studies
- Conference Coverage
- Full-Length Features
- Drug Monographs
- And More
{{login-button}} {{register-button}}
Want to read more?
Please login or register first to view this content.