Renal function is preserved better compared with radical nephrectomy.
Partial nephrectomy (PN) is superior to radical nephrectomy (RN) in preserving renal function even when tumors are larger than the traditional 4 cm cutoff, a new study suggests.
Géraldine Pignot, MD, PhD, of Bicetre Hospital, Paris XI University, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France, and colleagues analyzed data from 973 patients with renal tumors. The tumors were 4 cm or smaller in 665 cases (68.3%) and larger than 4 cm in 308 cases (31.7%).
Continue Reading
Surgeons performed PN in 663 cases (68.1%) and RN in 310 (31.9%). Patients who underwent PN had a smaller risk for experiencing significant changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) regardless of tumor size, according to findings published online ahead of print in Urologic Oncology.
In multivariate analysis, the use of RN, a preoperative GFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, a tumor size larger than 4 cm, and older age at diagnosis independently predicted significant postoperative GFR loss.
Enjoying our content?
Thanks for visiting Renal & Urology News. We hope you’re enjoying the latest clinical news, full-length features, case studies, and more.
You’ve viewed {{metering-count}} of {{metering-total}} articles this month. If you wish to read unlimited content, please log in or register below. Registration is free.
{{login-button}} {{register-button}}
Log in to continue reading this article.
Don’t miss out on today’s top content on Renal & Urology News. Register for free and gain unlimited access to:
- Clinical News, with personalized daily picks for you
- Case Studies
- Conference Coverage
- Full-Length Features
- Drug Monographs
- And More
{{login-button}} {{register-button}}
Want to read more?
Please login or register first to view this content.