The first change requires that medical experts who testify in medical malpractice cases will now need to be the same specialty as the physician who is the defendant in the case.
The second change allows defense attorneys representing a physician to obtain information about a plaintiff patient from subsequent healthcare providers. While the new measures were enacted as a way to cut down on frivolous lawsuits and make Florida more appealing to physicians, they have been objected to strenuously by the Florida Justice Association (FJA), a trial lawyers’ group.
Continue Reading
The FJA has argued that the new bills will make it more expensive and more difficult to obtain expert testimony, thus harming the ability of injured plaintiffs to seek justice.
For more information about the new measures, click here.
Enjoying our content?
Thanks for visiting Renal & Urology News. We hope you’re enjoying the latest clinical news, full-length features, case studies, and more.
You’ve viewed {{metering-count}} of {{metering-total}} articles this month. If you wish to read unlimited content, please log in or register below. Registration is free.
{{login-button}} {{register-button}}
Log in to continue reading this article.
Don’t miss out on today’s top content on Renal & Urology News. Register for free and gain unlimited access to:
- Clinical News, with personalized daily picks for you
- Case Studies
- Conference Coverage
- Full-Length Features
- Drug Monographs
- And More
{{login-button}} {{register-button}}
Want to read more?
Please login or register first to view this content.