VTE Prophylaxis Inadequate for Acute Kidney Injury Patients
In a study, AKI sufferers had an increased rate of venous thromboembolism whether they receive heparin prophylaxis or not.
Current dosing of low-molecular weight (LMWH) and unfractionated (UFH) heparins may not protect patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) from venous thromboembolism (VTE), according to researchers slated to present at the CHEST Annual Meeting 2017 in Toronto.
Aaron Holley, MD, and colleagues from the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, studied 6599 in-patients (mean age 54.6) admitted to the hospital for 2 or more days during 2009–2011. Among those who suffered VTE, 71% were diagnosed during admission, 11.7% within 30 days, and 7.2% 30 to 90 days after admission. The percentage of total hospital days on each agent was 21.7% for UFH and 41% for LMWH; 39.1% received no medication.
The investigators found no relationship between patients' body mass index (mean 28.5 kg/m2) and VTE rates at 90 days, but renal function did not have an impact. For the overall study population, a decrease in creatinine clearance was associated with an increased VTE rate at 90 days, but not among patients on UFH or LMWH. Patients with AKI had a significantly increased VTE rate whether they were on prophylaxis or not, according to the investigators.
"Current unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin dosing in the presence of acute kidney injury may not be sufficient to prevent VTE,” Dr Holley said in a press release issued by the American College of Chest Physicians, adding that “future studies need to address the optimal dosing of heparins in these cases.”
McMahon M, Mitchell J, Collen J, et al. Heparin prophylaxis does not prevent VTE in the presence of acute kidney injury. Chest. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.1078
Acute kidney failure with VTE proves difficult to treat [news release]. American College of Chest Physicians; October 23, 2017.