New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Survival After RP

Share this content:
Study shows a significant difference in all-cause and cancer-specific mortality between Gleason score 8 and Gleason score 9-10 disease.
Study shows a significant difference in all-cause and cancer-specific mortality between Gleason score 8 and Gleason score 9-10 disease.

A newly proposed prostate cancer (PCa) grading system can predict mortality risk after radical prostatectomy (RP) among men with Gleason score (GS) 8–10 disease based on both biopsy and RP Gleason scores, according to a new study. The study also demonstrated significant differences in all-cause and cancer-specific mortality after RP between men with GS 8 disease and those with GS 9–10 disease.

GS 8 and GS 9–10 disease commonly are lumped into a single high-grade entity (GS 8–10). The new grading system, however, subdivides GS 8–10 into GS 8 and GS 9–10 on the basis of differences in biochemical recurrence after RP.

A team led by Misop Han, MD, of Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions in Baltimore, Maryland evaluated the significance of distinguishing GS 8 and GS 9–10 in terms of long-term survival outcomes for both the preoperative setting using biopsy GS and the postoperative setting with RP GS. The study included 721 men with biopsy GS 8–10 and 1047 with RP GS 8–10. Compared with men who had GS 8 disease, men with GS 9–10 disease had later RP year and higher pathologic stage, Dr Han and his colleagues reported online ahead of print in European Urology. Among men with biopsy GS 8–10, 115 died (82 due to PCa) with a median follow-up of 3 years. Of men with RP GS 8–10, 221 died (151 due to PCa) with median follow-up of 4 years.

For both biopsy and RP GS, men with GS 9–10 disease had a significant 2-fold higher risk of PCa-related death than those with GS 8 disease in multivariable analysis, Dr Han's group reported. Men with biopsy and RP GS 9–10 disease had a significant 1.9 times and 1.6 times increased risk of all-cause mortality, respectively, compared with men who had biopsy and RP GS 8 disease.

In a discussion of study limitations, the investigators said they relied on retrospective data collection at a single institution. Consequently, the findings are sensitivity to selection bias and might not be generalizable. The researchers also noted that information about adjuvant and salvage therapy was not included in multivariable analyses.

Reference

1. Ham WS, Chalfin HJ, Feng Z, et al. New prostate cancer grading system predicts long-term survival following surgery for Gleason score 8–10 prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2016; published online ahead of print.

You must be a registered member of Renal and Urology News to post a comment.

Sign up for free e-Newsletters