In pediatric renal stone cases for which either shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or ureteroscopy would be appropriate, which approach do you prefer?

Researchers at Children's Hospital in Boston recently published a study in the Journal of Urology (2012;187:1402-1407) showing that the proportion of pediatric kidney stone cases treated with ureteroscopy has increased significantly relative to the use of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), which has long been the gold standard for treating children with kidney stones.

The study, which focused on 538 children from across the United States who underwent either SWL or ureteroscopy for renal stones, found that the proportion of cases treated with ureteroscopy increased from 24% from 2000-2002 to 50% in 2006-2008.

Renal & Urology News would like to ask urologists the following question.


Leave a comment below to explain your choice.

More in Polls & Surveys

Should kidney transplant programs provide long-term follow-up of living kidney donors?

A number of single-center studies show that living kidney donation is associated with minimal morbidity and mortality.

Is screening for cancer warranted following a kidney transplant?

Improvements in immunosuppressive therapy have resulted in longer survival of kidney transplants, but they also may increase malignancies.

Is radium-223 a game-changer for treatment of CRPC with symptomatic bone metastases?

This week, the FDA approved radium-223 injection for the treatment of CRPC with symptomatic bone metastases.