Do you think RP is a valid option for patients with high-risk clinically localized PCa?

Share this article:

The role of radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) is controversial, with some data suggesting it may be associated with outcomes comparable to those of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

For example, a study by Boorjian et al. (Cancer 2011;117:2883-2891) comparing RP, EBRT alone, and EBRT plus ADT showed that the three approaches are associated with similar long-term cancer control for patients with high-risk PCa.

Renal & Urology News would like to know how urologists view the use of RP for high-risk prostate tumors, so please answer the following poll question.


Share this article:
You must be a registered member of RUN to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

More in Physician Polls

Do you currently accept new Medicaid patients?

Do you currently accept new Medicaid patients?

The NHS has found that 31% of physicians were unwilling to accept new Medicaid patients.

How often do you try to persuade your patients who smoke to give up the habit?

How often do you try to persuade your ...

Doctors can play an important role in educating patients who smoke about the adverse health effects.

Is allowing patients direct access to lab results a good idea?

Is allowing patients direct access to lab results ...

A ruling from the HHS took effect allowing patients direct access to medical laboratory results.