Do you think RP is a valid option for patients with high-risk clinically localized PCa?

Share this article:

The role of radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) is controversial, with some data suggesting it may be associated with outcomes comparable to those of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

For example, a study by Boorjian et al. (Cancer 2011;117:2883-2891) comparing RP, EBRT alone, and EBRT plus ADT showed that the three approaches are associated with similar long-term cancer control for patients with high-risk PCa.

Renal & Urology News would like to know how urologists view the use of RP for high-risk prostate tumors, so please answer the following poll question.


Share this article:
You must be a registered member of RUN to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

More in Physician Polls

How do you feel about on-call emergency department coverage?

How do you feel about on-call emergency department ...

The nation's community hospitals are facing increasing problems obtaining emergency on-call coverage.

Have you ever recommended acupuncture to a patient?

Have you ever recommended acupuncture to a patient?

Evidence suggests acupuncture may help ease certain types of pain and perhaps other conditions

Are you more likely to perform partial rather than radical nephrectomy for tumors if robotic-assisted surgery is available?

Are you more likely to perform partial rather ...

Availability of robotic-assisted surgery at a hospital was independently associated with greater use of partial nephrectomy.