Are you more likely today to recommend active surveillance for selected patients with low-risk prostate cancer than you were five years ago?

Share this article:

Evidence is accumulating that active surveillance is an appropriate way to manage low-risk prostate cancer in selected men, with curative treatment delayed until it is warranted by indicators of disease progression. This evidence includes data showing that active surveillance does not cause a significant increase in prostate-cancer mortality compared with immediate treatment. In fact, an independent panel of the National Institutes of Health in December 2011 concluded that active surveillance is a viable option that should be offered to patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Renal & Urology News wants to know how urologists view active surveillance today compared with five years ago. Please take a few moments to answer our latest poll question:


Leave a comment below on why you chose your answer. If your answer doesn't match one of our choices, please let us know why.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of RUN to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

More in Physician Polls

How do you feel about on-call emergency department coverage?

How do you feel about on-call emergency department ...

The nation's community hospitals are facing increasing problems obtaining emergency on-call coverage.

Have you ever recommended acupuncture to a patient?

Have you ever recommended acupuncture to a patient?

Evidence suggests acupuncture may help ease certain types of pain and perhaps other conditions

Are you more likely to perform partial rather than radical nephrectomy for tumors if robotic-assisted surgery is available?

Are you more likely to perform partial rather ...

Availability of robotic-assisted surgery at a hospital was independently associated with greater use of partial nephrectomy.