Are you more likely today to recommend active surveillance for selected patients with low-risk prostate cancer than you were five years ago?

Share this article:

Evidence is accumulating that active surveillance is an appropriate way to manage low-risk prostate cancer in selected men, with curative treatment delayed until it is warranted by indicators of disease progression. This evidence includes data showing that active surveillance does not cause a significant increase in prostate-cancer mortality compared with immediate treatment. In fact, an independent panel of the National Institutes of Health in December 2011 concluded that active surveillance is a viable option that should be offered to patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Renal & Urology News wants to know how urologists view active surveillance today compared with five years ago. Please take a few moments to answer our latest poll question:


Leave a comment below on why you chose your answer. If your answer doesn't match one of our choices, please let us know why.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of RUN to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

More in Physician Polls

How much influence does the U.S. Surgeon General have on the nation's public health?

How much influence does the U.S. Surgeon General ...

The U.S. Surgeon General is the operational head of about 6,800 uniformed health officers.

During your career, have you ever rendered in-flight medical assistance?

During your career, have you ever rendered in-flight ...

It is inevitable that some passengers will become ill during a flight.

How do you feel about on-call emergency department coverage?

How do you feel about on-call emergency department ...

The nation's community hospitals are facing increasing problems obtaining emergency on-call coverage.